These developments in the industry are likely to heighten resistance of employees and workers to displacement in the industry particularly due to the lifetime employment agreements with manufacturing companies. (“Research articles,” 2011) II.
How might the employee skills, management practices, Ana automobile maturating companies change In ten future? How would you expect the managerial trends discussed in Chapter 2 to affect human resource practices and policies in future automobile manufacturing? Unskilled employees are rarely needed now.New technologies and operations require new competencies, as well as experience with autonomous problem solving and decision making. Creating a workforce with these new capabilities requires more effective human capital strategies and approaches. Better workforce planning is essential, as is a more innovative approach to Job design.
The ability to give existing workers new skill sets must go hand in hand with better recruiting. As automakers strive to sustain a new era of growth, they must ensure that their talent can grow with them.Companies need capabilities in “green” technologies, for example, as well as in the wireless services that increasingly are being embedded in cars, providing navigation, communication and other features. Central, Robbins, & Smith, 2011) According to Greer, the impact of technology on employee on employee skill requirements and Jobs was considered along with the impact on organization structure. In my opinion Working families will continue to pursue stability in the midst of these dynamic changes in the economy and population.
They will face challenges such as velveteen of technology and having the access to the tools to build their skills.Ill. Describe how the human resource and managerial environments of automobile manufacturing firms in the twenty-first century differ from the same environments in the asses. The most recent wave of globalization by U. S. Companies began in the asses, as companies began to realize that concentrating on the domestic market alone would lead to stagnant sales and profits and that emerging markets offered many opportunities for growth. Part of the motivation for this globalization stemmed from the lost market share in the asses to multinational companies from other countries, especially those from Japan.
Initially, these U. S. Companies tried to emulate their Japanese counterparts by implementing Japanese- Tyler management structures and quality circles. After adapting these practices to meet the needs of U. S. Companies and recapturing market share, these companies began to move into new markets to spur growth, enable the acquisition of resources (often at a cost advantage), and gain competitive advantage by achieving greater economies of scale. (“Strategy in the,” 2013) ‘V.
Explain how the North America Free Trade Agreement may affect the U. S. Automobile manufacturing workforce in the United States by the year 2010 Infant’s opponents attribute much of the escapement caused in the US labor market to the United States’ growing trade deficits with Mexico and Canada. According to the Economic Policy Institute, rise in the trade deficit with Mexico alone since NONFAT was enacted led to the net displacement of 682,900 U. S. Jobs by 2010 (Scott, 2011). Critics see the argument of the proponents of NONFAT as being one-sided because they only take into consideration export-oriented Job impact instead of looking at the trade balance, also known as net exports.