Section II STATUS OF ARMED FORCES OFFICERS VIS-À-VIS CIVILIANS When we were in school two and half in addition to a long time back, we were told then that a Second Lieutenant (2Lt) in the Army was equivalent to an IAS officer. In the Army, talking about of Pay (Money), Women and Politics are illegal. It had great reasons as well. These were the three things that could undoubtedly make a separation inside the powers. Men in uniform must be solid and joined with the goal that nothing diverts us from our point when we battle the foe, and we might battle till we kick the bucket – The Last Man – Last Bullet.
The majority of us in this way grew up unmindful and disconnected to the happenings in the passageways of energy. We confided in our seniors at the Army/Navy/Air Force HQ or the Services HQ and trusted the Govt would care for the Armed Forces.Having been raised in a situation where there was lack of gear, vehicles, ammo, and somberness measures and so on., an existence loaded with deficiencies was taken as expected. We were content with sustenance on the table, kids in school and a rooftop over our heads.
A point to point condition of military positions and common evaluations has dependably been a subject of discussion. In any case, at that point things have taken an unpalatable hand over the current past. While the reality of the matter is that a feeling of qualification of both military and common staff must not be permitted to win, it is similarly substantial that undue preferred standpoint of nearness to the basic leadership process must not turn into the request of the day. The Historical Perspective Customarily there dependably was a wide equality of pay movement between Class-I Civil Services (Now known as Group An) and the Commissioned Cadre of the Defense Services. There was likewise an expansive equality between the vocation movement of the Indian Police Service and the Defense Services, aside from at higher positions.
Besides, there was set up relativity between Lieutenant Colonels, Conservators of Forests and Superintending Engineers. Till the third Central Pay Commission (CPC), there was a sorry issue in comparability and it was comprehensively acknowledged that the Junior Time Scale (the beginning evaluation of straightforwardly named Class I Officers) was equivalent to a Lieutenant, the Senior Time Scale (Under Secretary to Govt of India) was equivalent to a Captain, the Junior Administrative Grade (Deputy Secretary to Govt of India/Joint Director) was at standard with a Major, the Selection Grade (now Director to Govt of India) was proportionate to a Lieutenant Colonel. fourth and fifth CPC. India’s advancement, monetary development and advance in correspondences gave us the truly necessary data that demonstrated to us that Armed Forces have been duped ideal from 1973.
It is just numerous years after the fact when Maj Dhanapalan prosecuted the Govt over the “Rank Pay” case we understood that presentation of Rank Pay in fourth CPC, was cleverly done which decreased the rank pay from the Basic pay, and it lessened the status of the Armed Force Officers concerning the Police and other non military personnel officers of a similar review. The fourth CPC presented a different type of pay framework for the Defense Services than the Civil Services with a running pay scale with partitioned segment of ‘rank pay’ being presented for protection officers however affable officers keeping up particular pay scales for each rank according to the prior framework. This was the begin purpose of the contention with no “scale to scale” unpleasant examination now accessible for each comparable to rank. The fifth CPC did not get any significant changes. Skewed condition by sixth CPC The sixth CPC, out of the blue, brought the issue pointedly out in the open. On Page 73 of the sixth CPC Report, the commission replicated a diagram of similar to military and common evaluations wherein it pegged the Group A Junior Time Scale with a Lieutenant and in addition a Capt, the Senior Time Scale with a Major, the Junior Administrative Grade with a Lt Col, the Selection Grade with a Colonel and a DIG with a Brig. There were however numerous illnesses in the diagram. For instance, while just a single of the Civil Selection Grade scales (Director) was duplicated and appeared against a Colonel, the other common Selection Grade scales (For instance the IPS Selection Grade of Rs 1650-1800) were not recreated at all and furthermore not reflected with the nearest military partner of Lt Col (Rs 1750-1950).
The rank of Capt was indicated comparable to Senior Time Scale (Under Secretary to Govt of India) in the third CPC table however all of a sudden demonstrated lessened beneath STS in the fourth CPC table and clubbed with a Lieutenant and Junior Time Scale. Obviously, there was no administration arrange downsizing a Captain from the prior level. There were different illnesses as well, for instance, the size of a DIG wrongly demonstrated undifferentiated from a Brigadier in the third CPC diagram was really that of the then existing evaluation of Additional IG which was later converged with IG, et cetera. The information, subsequently, was carefully chose and anticipated all things considered to toss the whole condition into confuse.
sixth CPC. The sixth CPC expanded everybody’s pay, except unobtrusively debased the Armed Forces by settling nearly bring down Grade Pays when contrasted with the rest. The Grade Pay moved toward becoming image of status identicalness among Central Govt representatives. A non military personnel Director who was before in bring down pay scales than a Lt Colonel, was given the higher Grade Pay equal to a Colonel. Truth be told Armed Forces officers who worked close by regular folks in associations like DRDO, Service HQ, MES, DGQA and so on., all of a sudden got themselves downgraded. Also, the total administration, in spite of having substantially speedier advancements, granted themselves the advantage of still higher pay by methods for Non Functional Upgradation (NFU), yet kept the military out of it incompletely because of ineffectively educated senior part in the Armed Forces itself.
seventh CPC. The seventh CPC additionally weakened things as civil servants traveled to similar higher Pay Levels by including NFU to their compensation scales, other than downsizing the remittances of military work force, particularly as for Disability Pensions. Development of a Group of Ministers Because of the downgradation of military positions by the sixth CPC, the Government chose to frame a Group of Ministers (GoM) to investigate the issue. The GoM at last recorded that the compensation of a Lt Col ought to be climbed to indicate his/her position over a Deputy Secretary to Govt of India/Joint Director yet beneath a Director and a Colonel.
The suggestions were acknowledged by the Cabinet. The contention was subsequently settled to a degree, however not to the total fulfillment of the guard administrations who had needed the rebuilding of status of Lt Col to Director Level Officers since both had comparative properties of pay and length of administration. The GoM likewise embraced the arrangement of a High Level Committee to additionally resolve the issue. To be completely forthright, even the requests of the military before the GoM were not legitimized at a couple of levels.
For instance, the guard administrations had requested the pre-fourth CPC reclamation of the rank of Capt to Senior Time Scale and that of Major to Junior Administrative Grade, overlooking in the deal, that at this point because of distinction in advancement courses of events by virtue of progress in rules, while a barrier officer was elevated to the rank of Capt in 2 years, a Group A common officer took 4 years to achieve Senior Time Scale, likewise for Major at 6 years and Junior Administrative Grade at 9 years and such a condition would have prompted an undue preferred standpoint to the resistance administrations. The present debate The present debate was activated in October 2016 when the Chief Administrative Officer of the MoD, the controlling officer for the unit of the Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Service (AFHQCS), issued an uneven update, downsizing the status of military positions even beneath the effectively discouraged levels explained by the sixth CPC. The notice compared a Colonel with a Joint Director of the AFHQCS (a Joint Director was generally likened with a Lt Col by the sixth CPC and later a Joint Director was set in the middle of a Major and a Lt Col by the GoM).
Assist the update compared a Director with a Brigadier however a Director had obviously been likened with a Colonel both by the sixth CPC and the GoM and endorsed thusly by the Cabinet. The Major General and Joint Secretary to Government of India equality misnomer Throughout the years, if not by plan, the sheen of the military rank has endured as a matter of course. Real General (today with 32 years of administration) has customarily been pegged at standard with Joint Secretary to Govt of India (as of now 19 years of administration) however it is sad how this has come to fruition. The beginning of this mistaken condition exudes from the way that pre-freedom, the Secretarial progressive system was in the request of Assistant Secretary to Govt of India (Stage 1), Under Secretary (Stage 2), Additional Deputy Secretary (Stage 3), Deputy Secretary (Stage 4), Joint Secretary (Stage 5), Additional Secretary (Stage 6) and Secretary (Stage 7). A Major General was likened with Joint Secretary which was a Stage 5 position in the chain of command and even the length of administration was comparable. Be that as it may, throughout the years, the terminologies in the Central Secretariat setup/Central Staffing Scheme were adjusted and arrangements re-assigned as Under Secretary (Stage 1), Deputy Secretary (Stage 2), Director (Stage 3), Joint Secretary (Stage 4), Additional Secretary (Stage 5), Secretary (Stage 6) and Cabinet Secretary (Stage 7).
Consequently, while the “Maj Gen = Joint Secretary” condition was shrewdly kept up on paper as some time recently, it was not understood that the past Stage 5 of the secretarial progression was presently Additional Secretary and thus Maj Gen ought to have held his fifth position, that is, Additional Secretary of date. Additionally, the condition of Joint Secretaries to Govt of India and Major General was not concerning all officers in the compensation of Joint Secretary, yet just with those officers who were at present holding the arrangement of Joint Secretary to the Govt of India on being empanelled in that capacity I