Site Loader

Mr. Sharp was caught with child pornography and the crown also, charged with distrusting of child pornography, underthe Criminal Code of Canada s.163.1(4). Also, he was charged with one count of possession for the purposes ofdistribution or sale under s.

163.1(3) Criminal Code of Child pornography. Mr.Sharpe, challenge the Courts, as he felt that thecrown and government has infringed s. 2(b) Under the Canadian Charter Right AndFreedom. Also, Mr.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

Sharpe felt it was justified, under 1(a) of the charter. Mr.Sharpe,he said the Criminal Code of Canada s.163.1(4) under s. 7 of the Charter, byarguing that he felt exposure to potential imprisonment terms as a result, ofan excessively sweeping law, is contrary to the principles of fundamentaljustice. Mr.

Sharpe said, he has the right to freedom of expression, that the pornographyhe had, an art form expression. That under the Criminal code Of CanadaS.163.1(4). Mr. Sharpe did not hurt anyone, in reality, to make the pictures,as this is just an art form, of which he used for personal.   Which the government, has broken theCharter Right And Freedom 2(b).

That protect anyone, that want to expressthemselves without being judge and judgment, against them. Also, Mr. Sharpesaid that the law has broken the law, under the charter (7), security andliberty of anyone that are Canadian.  Asa result, the government, had broken his right and should be tossed out thecourt.Remedy            The ofBritish Columbia of Appeal, said that the court has confronted with a law thatis substantially constitutional and peripherally problematic, the Court mayconsider a number of alternatives.

Until the Government of Canada, can findanother way to target evil people. Another alternative way is, might be to holdthat the law as it only applies to the case at bar is valid, declining to findit unconstitutional on the basis of a hypothetical scenario that has not yetarisen. In, the United State the law had court had 

Post Author: admin

x

Hi!
I'm Eric!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out